Nobuko statements appear in the middle of the controversy sparked in the country by the lawsuit filed yesterday against the Government for five women opposed to the law requiring lose maiden name upon marriage, and imposing a single name, so they are overwhelmingly women who are forced to adopt their husbands. The plaintiffs argue that the law violates individual freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.
In 1996, he prepared a draft law giving women the right to retain her maiden name but the Conservatives threw him because they believed that freedom could undermine the family unit.
The applicants also asked the government for a compensation of one million yen (9252 euros) for "psychological injury" suffered by the loss of their surnames.
Does this seem absurd? To me yes. What do they talk when they say they have "psychological damage" because their women do not take your name? Or better yet, What do they talk when they think that the household is guaranteed if the woman retains her maiden name? Everyone
customs, everyone his beliefs, but occasionally have to think if you really supposed stability of society and humanity lies in the convention and not in our ability to agree.
If that were the problem and resolve this conflict of humanity, lacking unless I change the name!
0 comments:
Post a Comment